|
M?tley Cr?e, Motley Crue Girls, Girls, Girls Average Rating: 
|
|
If you like "Girls, Girls, Girls", you might also like ...
Too Fast for Love |
Shout at the Devil |
Saints of Los Angeles |
The Dirt: Confessions of the World's Most Notorious Rock Band |
M?tley Cr?e |
| Customer Reviews 1-5 of 21 | NEXT >> |
2008-07-31Motley Crue-Girls, Girls, Girls ***1/2
Written, recorded, and released while the whole band was addicted to heroin, coke, and booze, Girls is Motleys cheapest album. It is the albums sloppiest sounding record to date, and the production suffers greatly from eighties cheese, and yet there is something endurring about this.
The lords prayer is turned into the coolest blasphemy on the albums opener 'Wild Side.' It's one of Motleys as well as rocks best bad boy songs. Nikki Sixx nailed the lyrics on this one. 'Girls, Girls, Girls' the albums title track roles next and keeps things going with some of Mick Mars best guitar playing as well as some of Vince Neils greatest vocals. 'Dancing On Glass' is one of Motleys unsung classics much like 'peice Of Your Action' or '[...].' 'Bad Boy Boogie' and 'All In The Name Of...' go hand in hand as both cheesy yet totally rockin' blues numbers. 'Five Years Dead' can get old but still pulls through. 'Somthin For Nothin' has a stolen Joe Perry Project riff, and actualy sounds like something they would have wrote as well. 'You're All I Need' was a swing and a miss, as was the pointless 'Nona.' 'Jailhouse Rock' a live cover of the Elvis classic is to me more blasphemous then 'Wild Side.' It is horrible to say the least.
Reissues are cool when they add bonus tracks, but these seem pointless. Instrumental tracks to the hits, okay...so what? The never before released track should have stayed that way. Thought the video the include for the title track will please die hards.
The album is a decent rock album for the ocassional spin but nothing to write home about. It has enough classics to make it worth owning and it is epecially fun before a Crue show when your in the parking lot.
2008-07-30Have always loved this CD since back in the day, so I had to buy a new copy after reading Nikki Sixxs book!! And the CD still rocks Hard!!
2007-12-29"Girls, Girls, Girls" was not nearly as good as "Too Fast For Love" or "Shout At The Devil", but it was better than "Theatre of Pain" and "Dr. Feelgood". I stopped listening to the Crue after "Girls, Girls, Girls". "Shout At The Devil" is their finest.
2007-09-26I remember the first time I heard the story behind "Your All I Need".
Pretty sad,Girls Girls Girls & Wild Side this whole album jams.
Even though I have to agree I like "Shout at the Devil" &
"Too Fast For Love" better.
I rate this album a 8 from 1to10!!
2006-08-17back in the 80's, the crue rocked my world and could not do anything wrong. after the one-two sucker punch of too fast and shout, nothing would or could stop the greatest heavy metal band since, well, you know the drill. looking back now, i cant beleive how naive i was back then. this, along with theatre of pain, are what i concider the weakest links in the motley crue chain of albums. not only does it sound dated, it also presents a band unsure of what they wanted. Sure, girls girls girls and wild side rocked, but everything goes downhill after that. this is forgetful pap and ranks with ToP as my least played motley cds. id still get this just to complete my collection but, as i have said in my other review, if you opt to get the definitive classic motley cd, get shout. and too fast for that matter. leave this alone if you are not a crue fan because chances are, you'll stay that way if you hear this...
1-5 of 21 | NEXT PAGE OF REVIEWS >>
If you like "Girls, Girls, Girls", you might also like ...
|
Too Fast for Love |
Shout at the Devil |
Saints of Los Angeles |
The Dirt: Confessions of the World's Most Notorious Rock Band |
M?tley Cr?e |
